When a PR modifies the admin settings surface, file/class structure, or data flow, the QA reviewer now flags the PR as a MAJOR concern unless the PR description references an accompanying update to the CTO app-map at `Peptide Repo CTO/app-maps/<repo-slug>.md`.
The CTO workspace is a separate repo, so CI cannot verify the doc update mechanically — the reviewer inspects the PR description for an explicit mention.
Why: the CTO-level app-maps are the single-pane-of-glass reference that lets the CTO answer questions like 'which settings does this plugin expose?' without grepping the repo each time. Without a merge-gate prompt, these maps drift out of sync with the code.
Co-authored-by: peptiderepo <peptiderepo@users.noreply.github.com>
9be13a089d