Initial commit: AutoBlogger v0.1.0

WordPress plugin that auto-researches topics from Reddit, generates
SEO-optimized articles via OpenRouter LLMs, runs them through a chief
editor agent, and publishes on a daily schedule.

Includes:
- Full generation pipeline (collect → analyze → score → generate → review → publish)
- Cost tracking and budget enforcement
- Admin UI: settings, review queue, metrics, activity log
- CI/CD pipeline (GitHub Actions → WordPress REST deploy)
- Unit test suite (PHPUnit + Brain Monkey)
- Structured logging with configurable verbosity

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

tests/unit/EditorialReviewTest.php

@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+<?php
+declare(strict_types=1);
+
+/**
+ * Unit tests for Autoblogger_Editorial_Review value object.
+ *
+ * The editorial review verdict drives the publish/draft/reject decision.
+ * A null revised_content on a "revised" verdict caused a bug (now fixed) —
+ * these tests ensure the value object correctly handles edge cases.
+ */
+class EditorialReviewTest extends \PHPUnit\Framework\TestCase {
+
+	public function test_approved_review(): void {
+		$review = new Autoblogger_Editorial_Review( [
+			'verdict'       => 'approved',
+			'notes'         => 'Good article, ready to publish.',
+			'quality_score' => 0.85,
+			'seo_score'     => 0.78,
+			'issues'        => [],
+		] );
+
+		$this->assertSame( 'approved', $review->get_verdict() );
+		$this->assertSame( 'Good article, ready to publish.', $review->get_notes() );
+		$this->assertNull( $review->get_revised_content() );
+		$this->assertEqualsWithDelta( 0.85, $review->get_quality_score(), 0.01 );
+		$this->assertEqualsWithDelta( 0.78, $review->get_seo_score(), 0.01 );
+		$this->assertEmpty( $review->get_issues() );
+	}
+
+	public function test_revised_review_with_content(): void {
+		$review = new Autoblogger_Editorial_Review( [
+			'verdict'          => 'revised',
+			'notes'            => 'Fixed heading structure.',
+			'revised_content'  => '<h1>Improved Article</h1><p>Better content.</p>',
+			'quality_score'    => 0.80,
+			'seo_score'        => 0.90,
+			'issues'           => [ 'H2 tags were missing' ],
+		] );
+
+		$this->assertSame( 'revised', $review->get_verdict() );
+		$this->assertNotNull( $review->get_revised_content() );
+		$this->assertStringContainsString( 'Improved Article', $review->get_revised_content() );
+		$this->assertCount( 1, $review->get_issues() );
+	}
+
+	/**
+	 * Edge case: "revised" verdict but null revised_content.
+	 * This happened in production when the LLM returned a malformed response.
+	 * The pipeline handles this with a null-coalesce fallback.
+	 */
+	public function test_revised_verdict_with_null_content(): void {
+		$review = new Autoblogger_Editorial_Review( [
+			'verdict'          => 'revised',
+			'notes'            => 'Supposedly revised but no content provided.',
+			'revised_content'  => null,
+		] );
+
+		$this->assertSame( 'revised', $review->get_verdict() );
+		$this->assertNull( $review->get_revised_content() );
+	}
+
+	public function test_rejected_review(): void {
+		$review = new Autoblogger_Editorial_Review( [
+			'verdict'       => 'rejected',
+			'notes'         => 'Off-topic and factually inaccurate.',
+			'quality_score' => 0.2,
+			'seo_score'     => 0.1,
+			'issues'        => [ 'Off-topic', 'Factual errors', 'Poor structure' ],
+		] );
+
+		$this->assertSame( 'rejected', $review->get_verdict() );
+		$this->assertCount( 3, $review->get_issues() );
+		$this->assertLessThan( 0.5, $review->get_quality_score() );
+	}
+
+	public function test_default_scores_are_zero(): void {
+		$review = new Autoblogger_Editorial_Review( [
+			'verdict' => 'rejected',
+			'notes'   => 'Minimal data.',
+		] );
+
+		$this->assertEqualsWithDelta( 0.0, $review->get_quality_score(), 0.01 );
+		$this->assertEqualsWithDelta( 0.0, $review->get_seo_score(), 0.01 );
+		$this->assertEmpty( $review->get_issues() );
+	}
+}