peptide-repo/prautoblogger
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

feat(prompts): versioned prompt registry, v1 seed, pinning + stamping

Browse Source 
Pipeline v2 Phase 1, commit 2/4. Prompt_Registry (read) +
Prompt_Registry_Writer (immutable create/activate/seed) over the new
prompts table; canonical v1 bodies extracted verbatim into
Prompt_Defaults(+Editorial) — single source for BOTH the seed migration
(Migrate_Prompt_Seed_V0180, flag-gated, self-healing) and the in-code
fallback, so a missing table renders byte-identical prompts and never
fatals. Call sites swapped: Content_Prompts, Analysis_Prompts,
Chief_Editor, LLM_Research_Provider. Includes the image-composer seam
keys image.rewriter_system + image.style_template (composer PR consumes,
must not add its own prompt storage).

Pinning: Cost_Tracker::set_run_id() registers the process run context,
ensures the runs ledger row, and pins active versions once per run;
log_api_call/log_image_generation stamp prompt_version (run pins) +
agent_role (stage map) on every generation_log row. Single-pass keeps
stage 'draft' and stamps content.single_pass explicitly.

Under-300 refactors: Content_Generator's four duplicated span/log blocks
consolidated into execute_stage() (301 -> 224 lines, behavior
identical); get_avg_tokens_for_stages body moved to Cost_Reporter with a
delegating wrapper kept for API compatibility.

Tests: byte-identical fallback renders (single_pass/outline/polish/
editor.system), token filling, key coverage incl. stage-map integrity.

Agent-Session: pipeline-v2-phase1-engineer-20260612
This commit is contained in:
peptiderepo
2026-06-11 04:12:32 +00:00
committed by peptiderepo
parent 1704d7f3a6
commit c723af927b
21 changed files with 1712 additions and 386 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

73
includes/core/class-chief-editor.php Executable file → Normal file
View File

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ declare(strict_types=1);
* Opik instrumentation: spans per review LLM call.
*
* Triggered by: PRAutoBlogger_Article_Worker.
* Dependencies: LLM_Provider_Interface, Cost_Tracker.
* Dependencies: LLM_Provider_Interface, Cost_Tracker, Prompt_Registry.
*/
class PRAutoBlogger_Chief_Editor {
@@ -92,54 +92,47 @@ class PRAutoBlogger_Chief_Editor {
/**
* Build system prompt for editorial review.
*
* v0.18.0: renders from the versioned registry ('editor.system') with a
* byte-identical in-code fallback; the admin's extra editor
* instructions stay a setting and are injected as a token value.
*
* @param string $niche Niche description from settings.
* @return string System prompt text.
*/
private function build_system_prompt( string $niche ): string {
$prompt = 'You are a senior blog editor';
if ( '' !== $niche ) {
$prompt .= " specializing in {$niche} content";
}
$prompt .= ". Review article drafts before publication.\n\n";
$instructions = trim( (string) get_option( 'prautoblogger_editor_instructions', '' ) );
$instructions_block = '' !== $instructions ? "\nAdditional instructions:\n" . $instructions . "\n" : '';
$prompt .= "Evaluate on: QUALITY, ACCURACY, SEO, COMPLETENESS, READABILITY.\n";
$prompt .= "Respond with JSON: {\n";
$prompt .= ' "verdict": "approved" | "revised" | "rejected",' . "\n";
$prompt .= ' "quality_score": 0.0-1.0,' . "\n";
$prompt .= ' "seo_score": 0.0-1.0,' . "\n";
$prompt .= ' "issues": ["issue1", "issue2"],' . "\n";
$prompt .= ' "notes": "Editorial notes",' . "\n";
$prompt .= ' "revised_content": "Full revised HTML if revised, null otherwise"' . "\n";
$prompt .= "}\n\n";
$prompt .= "Rules:\n";
$prompt .= "- APPROVE if quality_score >= 0.7 and seo_score >= 0.6\n";
$prompt .= "- REVISE if fixable issues exist — provide full revised HTML\n";
$prompt .= "- REJECT if fundamentally flawed\n";
$prompt .= "- Preserve formatting, links, lists when revising\n";
$instructions = trim( (string) get_option( 'prautoblogger_editor_instructions', '' ) );
if ( '' !== $instructions ) {
$prompt .= "\nAdditional instructions:\n" . $instructions . "\n";
}
return $prompt;
return PRAutoBlogger_Prompt_Registry::render(
'editor.system',
array(
'niche_clause' => '' !== $niche ? " specializing in {$niche} content" : '',
'instructions_block' => $instructions_block,
)
);
}
/**
* Build user prompt for editorial review.
*
* v0.18.0: renders from the versioned registry ('editor.review').
*
* @param string $content The generated HTML content.
* @param PRAutoBlogger_Article_Idea $idea The original article idea.
* @return string User prompt text.
*/
private function build_review_prompt( string $content, PRAutoBlogger_Article_Idea $idea ): string {
return sprintf(
"Review this article draft:\n\n" .
"BRIEF: Title: %s | Topic: %s | Type: %s\n" .
"KEY POINTS: %s\n" .
"TARGET KEYWORDS: %s\n\n" .
"CONTENT:\n%s",
$idea->get_suggested_title(),
$idea->get_topic(),
$idea->get_article_type(),
implode( ', ', $idea->get_key_points() ),
implode( ', ', $idea->get_target_keywords() ),
$content
return PRAutoBlogger_Prompt_Registry::render(
'editor.review',
array(
'title' => $idea->get_suggested_title(),
'topic' => $idea->get_topic(),
'article_type' => $idea->get_article_type(),
'key_points' => implode( ', ', $idea->get_key_points() ),
'keywords' => implode( ', ', $idea->get_target_keywords() ),
'content' => $content,
)
);
}