2cacaa3512
New Runware image backend at ~$0.0006/image (FLUX.1 schnell) — 65× cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Flash Image. Provider mirrors OpenRouter's split: interface + provider + support + pricing + batch, all under the 300-line cap. Batch class uses curl_multi for true parallel A/B dispatch — wall-clock drops to the slowest single image instead of the sum. Changes: - Add PRAutoBlogger_Runware_Image_Provider + Pricing + Support + Batch - Flip PRAUTOBLOGGER_DEFAULT_IMAGE_PROVIDER/MODEL to runware:100@1 - Add prautoblogger_runware_api_key settings field (encrypted at rest) - v0.9.0 one-time migration flips legacy default model + re-derives provider - Wire runware branch into Image_Pipeline::create_default_provider() - Add runware:100@1 and runware:101@1 to Image_Model_Registry (defaults top) - Update image prompt builder: no more anthropomorphized molecules; prefer concrete human-scale scenes (gym bros, doctors, scientists) - ARCHITECTURE.md + CHANGELOG.md updated with new integration + decision - Unit tests for pricing, support, provider; update model registry test Cost impact at 100 images/day (50 articles × A/B): - Before (Gemini via OpenRouter): $3.90/day ≈ $117/mo - After (FLUX schnell via Runware): $0.06/day ≈ $1.80/mo Net saving: ~$115/mo
86 lines
2.6 KiB
PHP
86 lines
2.6 KiB
PHP
<?php
|
|
/**
|
|
* Tests for PRAutoBlogger_Image_Model_Registry.
|
|
*
|
|
* The admin save flow (v0.8.0) collapses Provider and Image Model into a
|
|
* single dropdown and derives the provider from the model via
|
|
* Image_Model_Registry::provider_for(). This test pins that mapping down
|
|
* so a registry edit that breaks the contract fails CI.
|
|
*
|
|
* @package PRAutoBlogger\Tests\Services
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
namespace PRAutoBlogger\Tests\Services;
|
|
|
|
use PRAutoBlogger\Tests\BaseTestCase;
|
|
|
|
class ImageModelRegistryTest extends BaseTestCase {
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Every entry returned by get_models() must carry a non-empty id and
|
|
* a provider of 'runware', 'openrouter', or 'cloudflare'. If this breaks, the
|
|
* admin save flow will silently drop the provider derivation.
|
|
*/
|
|
public function test_every_registry_entry_has_id_and_known_provider(): void {
|
|
$models = \PRAutoBlogger_Image_Model_Registry::get_models();
|
|
$this->assertNotEmpty( $models );
|
|
|
|
foreach ( $models as $model ) {
|
|
$this->assertArrayHasKey( 'id', $model );
|
|
$this->assertNotEmpty( $model['id'] );
|
|
$this->assertArrayHasKey( 'provider', $model );
|
|
$this->assertContains(
|
|
$model['provider'],
|
|
[ 'runware', 'openrouter', 'cloudflare' ],
|
|
sprintf( 'Unexpected provider %s for model %s', (string) $model['provider'], (string) $model['id'] )
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* provider_for() returns the paired provider for a known model id.
|
|
* This is the core of the v0.8.0 collapsed-dropdown contract.
|
|
*/
|
|
public function test_provider_for_returns_paired_provider_for_known_model(): void {
|
|
$this->assertSame(
|
|
'cloudflare',
|
|
\PRAutoBlogger_Image_Model_Registry::provider_for( 'flux-1-schnell' )
|
|
);
|
|
$this->assertSame(
|
|
'openrouter',
|
|
\PRAutoBlogger_Image_Model_Registry::provider_for( 'google/gemini-2.5-flash-image' )
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Runware model ids (added v0.9.0) resolve to the 'runware' provider.
|
|
* This test pins the v0.9.0 default flip so a registry regression
|
|
* that loses the Runware entries fails CI loudly.
|
|
*/
|
|
public function test_provider_for_runware_models(): void {
|
|
$this->assertSame(
|
|
'runware',
|
|
\PRAutoBlogger_Image_Model_Registry::provider_for( 'runware:100@1' )
|
|
);
|
|
$this->assertSame(
|
|
'runware',
|
|
\PRAutoBlogger_Image_Model_Registry::provider_for( 'runware:101@1' )
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Unknown model ids return an empty string so callers can distinguish
|
|
* "not in registry" from a valid provider and show a settings error.
|
|
*/
|
|
public function test_provider_for_returns_empty_for_unknown_model(): void {
|
|
$this->assertSame(
|
|
'',
|
|
\PRAutoBlogger_Image_Model_Registry::provider_for( 'nonexistent/model' )
|
|
);
|
|
$this->assertSame(
|
|
'',
|
|
\PRAutoBlogger_Image_Model_Registry::provider_for( '' )
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|